In case you have any doubts that the word ‘liberal’ implies evolved, two recent stories on the  Huffington Post dispel that myth. One takes a hard look at which celebrity looks better wet and the other gives you, the reader, a chance to guess which boob job belongs to which celebrity, leaving one to  wonder if you might as well just surf internet porn or go buy a copy of Hustler.  As Buzzflash points out in conferring  its Media Putz Award on HuffPo,

(N)ewsgathering organizations have to rely on credibility and legitimacy. Articles on fake celebrity boobs with no news value destroy both. As of this writing, this photo essay has received 1,158,595 views — a lot of hits — but at what price?

The Huffington Post has been portrayed as a progressive news Web site run by a woman, yet the site is filled with celebrity misogynist content, none more egregious than the fake celebrity breasts photo essay.

The misogyny at HuffPo however goes beyond content however.  A study by FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) in late 2008 found that over a nine week period, only 23% of the HuffPo bylines were by women.  Jessica Wakeman writes,

Of the 89 times bylines were checked during the study, not once did the number of women’s bylines equal those belonging to men. Only eight times did women account for more than a third of all bylines. And Arianna Huffington, appearing 57 times, accounted for more than a fifth of all women’s bylines; 45 of those occupied the most visible top post. Only once, in fact, did a woman other than Arianna Huffington get her byline in the most visible top slot.

While it is particularly frustrating to see this in a news outlet that was founded by a woman, as Wakeman points out, those stats are in line with the industry norm.

Needless to say, as a woman who happens to write, this is pretty discouraging.   Regardless of what I write and how well I say it, the chances of getting my worked picked up by a major outlet and getting wide readership are lousy.  And I guarantee you this, by using the word “porn” in the title to this post, it will get many, many more hits than earlier posts this week about the perilous situations faced by sheroic human rights activists in Columbia and Burma (you did read those posts, didn’t you?).

As Catherine Orenstein of the Op-Ed Project, who is quoted in the FAIR piece quite accurately puts it, “The ways people get the most attention are still stacked.”

Postscript:  In the Look What They’ve Done To My Song Ma category of publicity stunts that make you go eeewww, Bob Dylan’s latest album probably should have been called, “Don’t Think Twice, It’s Definitely Not Alright.”  Truly a sad day in folk music and another fine example of the unevolved liberal ethos.

Update:  Kudos to WIMNs Voices Blogger Miranda Spencer for pointing out that HuffPo is apparently not content to rest on their laurels after winning the coveted Media Putz award, lookee what they posted today (hint, it involves bikinis and breast implants). Of note, all three of these offensive pieces are all written by Katherine Thomson, Senior Features Editor at HuffPo,  here’s hoping she and Arianna get together and do some serious rethinking of what they are featuring.  Soon.

On a much more cheerful note, check out this fabulous example of feminist media table-turning!

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Many thanks to Ten Apples and a Flat Sponge for pointing to this outrageous plastic surgery hack job of the image of Venus, voluptuous Goddess of beauty and love.  Here is a photo of Bertel Thorvaldsen’s Venus With Apple:

And here is a liposuctioned resin model of the same that you can buy at the Thorvaldsen Museum in Copenhagen:

As Ten Apples so rightly puts it,

“See this? It’s not just the supermodels on the cover of Cosmo, it’s not just Oprah, it’s not just Kiera Knightly or whatever her name is, being stretched and elongated on her movie posters. Oh, no! Even Botticelli’s Venus and the Thorvaldsen Aphrodite are “too fat” and not bobble-headed enough to sell in today’s market. They’ve been Slim-fasted and Photoshopped (or had ribs removed) because in someone’s opinion, even neo-classic art lovers who would be looking to decorate their homes with reproductions of their favorite pieces would not want to look at such chubby women as artists like Botticelli chose, as models.

(B)before you dash off an impassioned email to the manufacturer, ask yourself this question: IF the company were to refigure the statuettes to fix the problems, would you be willing to make a commitment to support their business by placing an order, and enlisting your friends and family to support their business as well?* By all means, use these images for educational purposes, and to help increase our cultural “visual literacy”. But remember that outrage comes cheap on the internet–finding constructive solutions to problems is harder. Are you a part of the solution, or merely venting personal frustrations?”

*Keep in mind that it’s a manufacturer, with quantity wholesale requirements.

Point taken, and it isn’t as if creative license hasn’t been taken with say the likes of Jesus, but the business of making girls and women feel insecure about what they look like is a very profitable business and the redefining of time trusted images of goddesses is repugnant and very damaging.

Moving on… Make Love Not Porn, is a site developed by Cindy Gallop around the thesis that, “Things are pretty straightforward in the world of hard-core.  Real live sex- not so much.”  The website offers various porn perceptions versus reality, such as:

Porn World:

  • Men love coming on women’s faces, and women love having men come on their faces.

Real World:

  • Some women like this, some women don’t.  Some guys like to do this, some guys don’t.  Entirely up to personal choice.

In an e-mail, Gallop explains her goal in creating the site,

My objective with MLNP is to stimulate an open, healthy discussion about sex to counterbalance the fact that in a culture of puritanism and double standards, where most parents are too embarrassed to speak to their children about sex and educational institutions are not encouraged to implement programs to compensate for this, hard core porn has become, de facto, today’s sex education.  I am not anti-porn, in fact I am a fan of porn and watch it regularly myself, but for a number of reasons porn tends to present one world view;  porn goes, ‘this is the way sex is’, and I just want to get more people talking, and doing, around the idea of ‘not necessarily’.

Kudos to Gallop for tackling a difficult subject and for doing so in a way that encourages dialog.

Which brings us to the final part of this little triptych of musing on sexuality and the debasement thereof.  Raw Story is reporting that Kristin Davis, a New York madam has told ABC News that Wall Street CEO’s, bankers, lawyers and media execs have been paying for the service of her employees at the rate of $2,000 an hour with corporate credit cards.  According to Raw Story, names on the madam’s list that have been confirmed by ABC include,

  • A vice president of NBC Universal (owned by General Electric)
  • The part owner of a Major League Baseball team who “loves Kelsey”
  • The CEO of one of the country’s largest private equity firms who met “Cameron” at the Peninsula Hotel
  • A major New York real estate developer who, according to the list, “will come to the door wearing women’s panties”
  • A partner at the Wall Street law firm Cravath Swaine Moore “looking for a party girl to come fully equipped” and spent a total of $20,000
  • An investment banker from Lehman Brothers who saw “Kelsey and Keely together” and later saw “Aria and Skyler at the same time”
  • An investment banker at JP Morgan Securities who “loves Brooke” and spent $41,600
  • An investment banker at Goldman Sachs who “only wanted all-American girls” and spent $27,000
  • A managing director from Merrill Lynch who saw “Lana” using the name “Nataly”
  • A managing director from Deutsche Bank “who called about seeing Nataly again”

In other words not only are we getting screwed by Wall Street and the banks, looks like it isn’t just figuratively.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare

Bailing Out Obscenity

 Comments Off
Jan 072009
 

I’ve got to hand it to the porn industry because if this isn’t obscene, I don’t know what is:

Hustler publisher Larry Flynt and Girls Gone Wild CEO Joe Francis said Wednesday they will request that Congress allocate $5 billion for a bailout of the adult entertainment industry.

Francis said in a statement that “the US government should actively support the adult industry’s survival and growth, just as it feels the need to support any other industry cherished by the American people.”

Flynt and Francis concede the industry itself is in no financial danger — DVD sales have slipped over the past year, but Web traffic has continued to grow.

But the industry leaders said the issue is a nation in need. “People are too depressed to be sexually active,” Flynt said in the statement. “This is very unhealthy as a nation. Americans can do without cars and such but they cannot do without sex.”

“With all this economic misery and people losing all that money, sex is the farthest thing from their mind. It’s time for congress to rejuvenate the sexual appetite of America. The only way they can do this is by supporting the adult industry and doing it quickly.

Given the behavior of so many of our elected officials, there is a reasonable chance that this will sail through much faster than funding for more mundane things like healthcare, food and education.

H/t to Shireen Mitchell of Digital Sisters for pointing out this pornographic funding fantasy.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Hopefully this isn’t a sign of the end times, but for the  second time this week, I find myself writing about people being nailed.  We don’t get much snow around here and when we do, I usually confine my play to snowball fights and snow angels so I am grateful to Lezlee Springer up in Vermont  for alerting me to Burton Snowboards’ violent and misogynist advertising campaign.

burtonprimodetail.jpg

Detail from “Primo” ad

Ironically, Burton has provided support in the past to agencies such as Spectrum Youth and Family Services in Vermont which now must say no to this support for ethical reasons.

burtonlove1.jpg

“Love” ad

According to Burton, the ads are ok because they are marketed to people over the age of 18 and it is a matter of free speech, to which Mark Redmond, Executive Director of Spectrum has this response that says it all:

“Well you know what, I think I have some rights too. I think I have the right to get on a quad chairlift at Bolton this winter with my 5-year-old and not have him subjected to any of these scenes when someone who has foolishly purchased one of these boards sits next to us.”

Agreed, not only is the horrific violence  that is portrayed inappropriate for something used  where children are present, but the misogynist objectification, not to mention confusing of love with pornography sends a very damaging and insulting message as well.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
Oct 132008
 

I would have thought it was an oxymoron, but hey, guess what, there is such a thing as PG Porn.  And how you ask is that possible?  Easy silly, you just take out the sex and leave the violence.  And who do we have to thank for this marvelous concept?  Their names are James, Sean and Brian Gunn and and as Theresa Darklady Reed explains,

“The Gunn brothers apparently consider violence against women to be not just acceptable but sexy, so long as nobody actually gets laid or engages in any wet spot to erogenous zone contact.

At issue is “Nailing Your Wife,” an on-its-face standard porn plot rehash featuring a slap bass intro, stilted acting, and the quintessential horny wife cheating on her quick-as-a-bunny husband with the classic everyman construction worker”

“Indeed, in the site’s introductory clip, beautiful Penthouse Pet Aria Giovanni never gets a chance to show her famous breasts or even catch a peek at what’s tucked inside of “Firefly” actor Nathan Fillion’s trousers. Instead of ruining a perfectly good sex scene with actual sex, the Gunn trio chose to make the pop shot something they think their viewing audience will find more easily digestible: a fatal nail gun spike through the heroine’s head.”

No, sorry, we don’t find this at all entertaining.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare