For all the reports, hearings and commissions about taking sexual assault in the military seriously, The Washington Post’s recent article about a radio show that has been broadcast to troops in Iraq paints a picture of blatant sexism and disrespect for women.  According to the WaPo, Freedom Radio’s Morning P-T show has been entertaining troops with gems such as,

“What’s the most important physical trait a woman can possess? According to a magazine: a pretty face. You have to be able to look her in the face.”

“That can be fixed by a coupla drinks and turning the lights off.”

and

There has been funny business: An on-air deconstruction of Britney Spears’s anatomy and behavior, a sermon about feminism and the emasculation of the American male (note–you really need to click this link and listen),

Not only does the military apparently think this is entertaining, but the WaPo itself thinks it is “funny business”.  Ha ha, we’re not laughing and we can assume that this hilarity not is uncomfortable for women serving in the military and some of the men as well.

The article quotes Quality Control Officer Sgt. Don Dees as saying,

“Some of us more advanced in rank and age sometimes bristle at [Prickel and Townsend’s] methodology, but their intent is to reach their target audience, and they know where the line is.”

No, apparently they did not get the memo about treating women with respect and have no idea where the line is, because guess what, get a clue–when you disrespect and objectify women, that makes them more vulnerable to sexual assault and other forms of violation.  What this charming story about entertaining the troops tells us is that sexism is alive and well and tolerated in the military and the Pentagon is not yet walking its talk in this regard.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Ten years ago, after the World Trade Center towers crumbled, the United States declared a war on terror. At first we were told we would defeat the enemy quickly. But that war with its ever-shifting enemies and goals continues today with no end in sight. In late 2001, we were told that one of the reasons it was imperative that we attack Afghanistan was to liberate Afghan women from the Taliban. And then a few months later we were told that we must also rescue Iraqi women.

But the truth is that women’s human rights were never a priority, merely an excuse for exerting military domination. Today in Afghanistan and Iraq, the problems faced by women are myriad, little has been improved and much has been made worse. In Afghanistan, women continue to be maimed and beaten and their maternal mortality rate continues to be the second highest in the world. In Iraq, trafficking of women has increased dramatically, women human rights defenders are attacked in public places and women’s health, jobs and education has suffered dramatically as a result of the U.S. invasion.

Looking beyond Afghanistan and Iraq, the gender-specific impact of war and violence is all too apparent throughout the world.

  • It is not possible to say that  women’s lives are a priority while we stand by as crises like the never-ending mass rapes in the Democratic Republic of Congo continue unabated.
  • It is not possible to say that women’s lives are a priority while women refugees are raped in Somali refugee camps or while women are murdered in Guatemala and Mexico and their killers go unpunished.
  • It is not possible to say that women’s lives are a priority when women’s reproductive rights are under siege in the U.S. and throughout the world.
  • It is not possible to say that women’s lives are a priority when women are afraid to walk down the street for fear of being attacked and harassed or of going home and being beaten and raped behind closed doors.
  • It is not possible to say that women’s lives are a priority when women are more likely to be food insecure, have less access to education and earn less than men throughout the world.

The monumental irony is that it has been proven time and time again that when women do not live in fear and when they have equal access to food and education and work, we are all better off and there is less likelihood of violence.  We cannot improve women’s lives by bombing their countries and when conflict does occur, we cannot truly resolve it unless women have a full and equal stake in the peace-making.

The only way to end terrorism is to quit creating terrifying conditions and the uncomfortable truth is that in the years since the World Trade Center towers fell, the U.S. has done everything in its power to create and further the conditions in which terror ferments.  As long as we persist on this path, we will live in a state of terror that only exacerbates the undeclared war on women.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

The other night I had dinner with a male friend.  Afterwards he walked me to my car and I was glad he did because even in a very nice neighborhood, it always feels a little bit unsafe to walk alone, especially after dark.  In 50 plus years of living, I’ve long since lost track of the number of times I’ve been harassed on the street, usually minor incidents, but even minor incidents are intimidating and uncomfortable.  And that is why I attended SlutwalkDC.

According to the dictionary, the word “slut” means:

  1. a dirty, slovenly woman.
  2. an immoral or dissolute woman; prostitute.

The origin of the word can be traced back to the 1300′s, from the Norwegian word slutte, meaning impure liquid.  A derogatory label to say the least.  Which is why I was extremely uneasy when I first heard about the slutwalks that have been taking place in various cities around the world.

The slutwalks began after Toronto police proclaimed that, “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized”.  And that is precisely what this is about.

Time and time again, violence and harassment is blamed on the victim–what they wore, what they said, or simply their lack of penis and courts and police have all to often reinforced this in the way they investigate and prosecute these incidents.  Slutwalk isn’t saying that we like the word slut, it is about saying it doesn’t matter what we are wearing or saying or how we are acting, we have had enough of being harassed because we dared to walk down the street while being female.

So on a hot, humid and at times rainy day, hundreds of women and male allies marched down the streets of of Washington, DC.  Holly Kearl of the DC based Stop Street Harassment put it this way in her remarks to the crowd,

…we are taking back that power with our activism, with our SlutWalks and by refusing to be silent. We are creating power by being here today and walking and speaking out together.

Could this movement be called something like, “Women Against Street Harassment” instead of using the word slut?  Yes, but it would get a lot less attention.  Women have been speaking out against harassment since forever, and yet here we are with the problem continuing, so you know what?  If even the Toronto police are going to call us sluts because of how we dress, then it is time to use the word to turn the tables.  It also opens the door for great visuals and awesome signs, costumes and art were out in abundance at the walk in DC.  In addition to the pictures I’ve included here, there are more on the Feminist Peace Network Facebook page.

Finally, shared with her kind permission, Australian poet Susan Hawthorne recorded this poem about the use of the word slut:

———- Slut but but 2 compact small by Susan Hawthorne

———

Am I still uncomfortable about claiming the word “slut”?  Yes.  But that isn’t the issue here.  The issue is that women should never be blamed for the actions of their abusers and when that blaming continues to be institutionalized by those who are supposed to protect us, then that is what should make us uncomfortable, not the name we chose to give to our response.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
Jun 092011
 

I don’t have time to write about this at length right now because I am in the middle of moving for the first time in 20 years, but late last night I suddenly started getting requests for interviews from British media regarding the International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor’s statement that the reports of Libyan forces using rape and Viagra as weapons of war were creditable and would be investigated/prosecuted by the ICC.  This morning I heard from a Canadian media outlet.  So far none from the U.S. where everyone is very busy covering Weiner-gate.

A few quick hit thoughts on the rape allegations.  First, they are not a surprise, rape has always been used as a weapon of war.  What is significant is that the ICC classifies rape as a war crime which means that there is now hope that this crime will have ramifications and that rape will no longer be considered collateral damage at which we merely shrug our global shoulders.

Interesting point–Libya does not recognize the ICC’s authority.  Neither does the U.S.  It is not clear to me therefore how this plays out legally, but if they can prosecute Libyans, one wonders if there is any thought of prosecuting the rape of servicewomen (and men) within the ranks of the U.S. military, let alone the too many rapes to mention committed by U.S. service personnel throughout the world.

The use of Viagra type drugs is obviously quite disturbing.  There needs to be a full investigation of just how they are getting hold of prescription drugs in this manner and that pipeline needs to be stopped if this part of the story bears up.

One thing is clear, the war on women needs to be considered an integral part of the war that needs to be resolved in Libya and the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 should be considered as absolutely necessary towards that end in addition to the ICC’s action.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Via the Nobel Women’s Initiative:

“Dear Friends;

  • Did you know that up 500,000 women were raped during the Rwandan genocide?
  • Did you know that over 64,000 women were raped in Sierra Leone?
  • Did you know that over 40,000 women were raped in Bosnia-Herzegovina?
  • Did you know that thousands of women are raped every day in Sudan and Democratic Republic of Congo?

Enough is enough.
Thursday is our international day of action against sexual violence in conflict.

Nobel Peace Laureates Jody Williams, Shirin Ebadi and Mairead Maguire will TAKE A STAND to end rape in war. We urge you to TAKE A STAND in your home country and join us virtually.

Following the unprecedented conference in Montebello, Quebec where they hosted over 120 women from around the world to discuss strategies to address sexual violence, the Laureates will be TAKING A STAND in Ottawa – addressing Canadian parliamentarians and urging them to take the lead to end rape in war.  Together – through online action – we can also take this message to governments all over the world.

Take  a stand:

  • Go to the UN Action Stop Rape Now website at http://bit.ly/m4GiDb and download the sample letter asking your elected official for increased action against sexual violence in conflict – and send it! Tell your government you are TAKING A STAND!
  • Write a blog post, tweet or share on Facebook. We will be posting videos and live-tweeting throughout the day – letting you know what ACTION we are taking.
  • Make sure to check the NWI blog and follow the #endrapeinwar hashtag. Use it in your posts – lets make it trend!

Sample tweets:

  • Hundreds  of women will be raped today. TAKE A STAND and send a letter to your gvt urging to #endrapeinwar http://bit.ly/m4GiDb
  • Almost 48 women are raped every hour in Congo. TAKE A STAND and send a letter to your gvt urging to #endrapeinwar  http://bit.ly/m4GiDb

Sample  Facebook posts:

  • As you sit at your computer right now, hundreds of women around the world are being raped as a strategic tactic of war. Tell your government: enough is enough! TAKE A STAND and send a letter to your elected official urging them to take action. link:  <http://bit.ly/m4GiDb> http://bit.ly/m4GiDb
  • Women  Nobel Peace Laureates are TAKING A STAND to end sexual violence in conflict. Why don’t you? Send a letter to your elected official urging them to be a leader by acting to end rape!
    link: http://bit.ly/m4GiDb

Make  sure you let us know when you have TAKEN A STAND by:

Women Nobel Laureates are taking a stand to #endrapeinwar . TAKE A STAND and send a letter to your government urging action: http://bit.ly/m4GiDb

Join us on Thursday. Together – we can move the earth.”

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare