As bad as the Stupak Amendment is, it is quickly becoming clear that major media distortions of the impact of the Amendment are part of the problem.  As Jodi Jacobson notes on RHRealityCheck,

An article by Kathleen Seelye in today’s New York Times titled “In Congress, a Predicament for Abortion Supporters,” can now be added to the growing list of media analyses that fail to accurately portray the implications of the Stupak amendment should it become law.

In addition as Kelli Garcia of the National Women’s Law Center points out, a recent column by EJ Dionne i the Washington Post also gets it disturbingly wrong,

The Stupak Amendment is not, as Dionne argues, a compromise or a minor change to the status quo. As NWLC Vice President for Health and Reproductive Rights Judy Waxman detailed in an earlier post, the Stupak Amendment will greatly limit women’s access to abortion coverage and will deny many women the ability to purchase such coverage using their own money.

Clearly, getting the impact of this amendment fully and truthfully understood, let alone fighting it, is going to be an uphill battle and it really points to the urgent importance of supporting women’s advocacy groups and independent women’s media.  I urge you strongly to make RH Reality Check and the National Women’s Law Center’s Women’s Stake websites a regular part of your news gathering.  Share the links, make sure your friends know what is truly at stake.

Wouldn’t you know it– while we silly feminists have been agonizing about the impact of the Stupak Amendment after Nancy and the Cardinals did the C Street Shuffle at the Saturday Night Congressional Jerk I mean Dance Off it turns out that if we really want to keep our reproductive rights, all we need to do is get a job at the RNC or the anti-choice group Focus on the Family cuz their health plans cover, wait for it, ABORTION.  Really.

I don’t even know why this surprises me.  The entire health care debate without end has been one long-winded exercise in stupid.  From the get go the sad thing is that what passes as discourse has suffered from the same malady as the abortion issue–a deeply flawed frame.  In the case of abortion, the minute the word ‘choice’ and the phrase ‘pro-life’ became the descriptors, the discussion we should have been having about women’s reproductive rights was gone.

As for health care, we have had all manner of false flag buzzwords–public option, triggers, yada yada everything centered around the cost of premiums totally losing sight of the fact that health care is a human right, not a commodity that needs to be delivered in a way that keeps pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies afloat  so they will keep funding our elected representatives.  Our health care system is ill, it is a disgrace and it is an affront to human decency.  Ditto our Congress who, with very few exceptions have apparently had frontal lobotomies and seem to be suffering from some painful form of spinal disintegration.  What part of just fix it could possibly not be clear?  The answer of course is apparently the whole damned thing and until we insist that Congress get their little patooties (I leave it to you to decide what part of the anatomy you feel that should describe) pointed in the right direction and back on topic, our health care is going to remain in critical condition.

One of the most galling aspects of the Stupak Amendment is that after months of dithering, pontificating, waffling and other forms of ass covering that pass for political debate these days, Stupak happened in the 11th hour before a Saturday vote leaving reproductive justice advocates doing a lot of WTF-ing.  I am still deeply shocked that the Democratic leadership that has been so unable to use its majority position to act decisively could all of a sudden simply decide that women’s reproductive rights could just cavalierly be thrown to the Blue Dogs for the sake of the last 3 votes.  It is just breathtaking even though it has come to light in recent months that our current system has been shafting women on many health care fronts for quite some time–higher premiums, maternity care, etc.  As I  noted last week, even high risk state insurance pools have been discrimination against women.

But what is the deal with Pelosi making a last minute concession of this magnitude to the Catholic Church? Wendy Norris sheds some light on why this isn’t just a matter of the Catholic Church playing the abortion card on a moral basis, it is also has a  huge stake in the financial ramifications of the health care legislation,

The justifiable anger at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for lobbying on the Stupak-Pitts amendment overshadows what is possibly the bigger motive for the Vatican: the billions of dollars at stake for the church’s hospitals.

The scale of the church’s involvement in the rapidly growing $2.5 trillion dollar American health care industry is staggering.

Abortion may be safe, it may be legal.  But if it isn’t affordable, it is de facto not available and that is detrimental to women’s health and an unacceptable compromise, as is the premise that the health of corporations or the Catholic Church trumps  that of people.  For additional commentary on this  issue, please also read,

A few thoughts on last night’s health care reform vote and the Stupak Amendment.  First of all, 26 out of the 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak then proceeded to vote against the health care reform bill. In other words, women’s reproductive rights were severely compromised to appease 41 members of Congress.  The final vote on the health care bill was 220-215, so only a few of those votes were needed in the first place to secure the vote. For this, in the 11th hour, Nancy Pelosi made a deal with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Many reproductive justice advocates watched the final train wreck on C Span last night in stunned anger, trying to understand how this happened.  Jodi Jacobson, who has covered this issue very thoroughly on RH Reality Check wrote,

Why when millions of women need basic sexual and reproductive health care is it important for the USCCB to be “working out” any plan?  What does Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi or any other member of Congress owe the Catholic Bishops that they do not owe the majority of women in this country?  What does Obama owe the Bishops that he does not owe you and me, for example, most of those of us who gave money and time and our lives to his campaign?Do we live in a theocracy?

Honestly: I would like an answer. From the White House.  From the House Leadership.  And you should want one too.

One reaction that I do take issue with is Jane Hamsher‘s assertion that NARAL and Planned Parenthood shoulder part of the blame for what happened.  As much as I  generally respect Hamsher, her reasoning is baffling.

But let’s be clear about this. The only reason that we are in the position where the price of passing health care reform is allowing even liberal Marcy Kaptur to sneeringly dismiss choice activists as narrow class warriors who don’t care about working women is because Planned Parenthood and NARAL have allowed it to happen.  They collect millions of dollars in revenue each year. They’ve exacted no price from the Marcy Kapturs of the world, who actually have to care what liberals think of them, and focused instead on anti-choice Republicans who are only empowered by their ire.  They have no scalps. There is no price for bucking Planned Parenthood and NARAL.  It isn’t a fight that the Democrats want to spend “political capital” on, and these groups insure that they don’t have to.

Forget about the fact that more Americans are now anti-choice than pro-choice for the first time since Gallup has been polling the issue.  More and more Democrats in Congress each year are anti-choice, despite the fact that the party is .  It’s acceptable now.  These groups have the lobbyists, the money, the access, and their leadership uses it for their own personal advancement while the cause they purport to defend withers on the vine.

The national Planned Parenthood organization listed $126 million in assets in 2007.  Cecile Richards made $385,163 .  The state chapters whose employees put their lives on the line so women can have the right to choose deserve support and protection within the Democratic party that she is not providing.

NARAL paid Nancy Keenan $145,538 from the Foundation in 2007, which listed total assets of $4,119,329.  But the NARAL PAC reports $87,125 cash on hand as of September 30, 2009.

And that kind of money was a match for the Catholic Church, Big Pharma and the Insurance companies?  I don’t think so.  No question there are things over the years both organizations could, in hindsight have done better.  But their accomplishments speak for themselves and victim blaming is just not acceptable here.

As @mikkipedia on Twitter said, “Had a nightmare that extremists took healthcare hostage and the Dems bargained away women’s rights to get it back. Wait…”  Imagine if instead we had a dream where our elected officials  stood up against the few in defense of our human rights.  Imagine.


In recent months we’ve learned that health insurance companies frequently charge women more than men for health insurance.  But they aren’t the only ones.  State High Risk plans that are designed to cover people who have ‘pre-existing conditions’ or for other reasons cannot obtain insurance in some case also discriminate.

First the good news, some states don’t discriminate.  Among them–Montana, Alaska and Minnesota.  Among those that do, the rates are all over the place.  For comparison’s sake, I arbitrarily looked at rates for 33 year olds with $1000 deductibles.  In Kentucky, a woman would pay $501, a man $249.  In Connecticut a woman pays $664, a man $393.  And most insidious (albeit the cheapest of the ones I compared) in Arkansas, a non-smoking woman pays $267 and a man who smokes pays only $247.

This isn’t meant to be a comprehensive list and I have no idea how or if this is handled in the small print of the voluminous healthcare bill that may or may not be passed this weekend.  But I am just speechless that the problem of gender discrimination has not been limited to private companies but has also been perpetrated by state-run programs.  The women of America are  due a major rebate.  Call it the Gender Discrimination Insurance Reparations Act of 2009.

Data quoted above came from state plans found via the Council for Affordable Health Insurance.

  • Share/Bookmark

Health insurance provider Humana’s recent announcement of a 65% increase in their 3rd quarter earnings really got my attention because last week I participated in a health care reform rally at their corporate headquarters in Louisville, KY.  After an outdoor gathering attended by 150 or so people, many of those gathered walked peacefully into the Humana building to stage a sit-in.  One local newscaster breathlessly proclaimed that we had “stormed” the building, even though their own footage showed that clearly didn’t happen.  They then gave a Humana spokesman a fair and balanced opportunity to tell viewers that Humana agreed with the protesters that there should be health care reform.

Oh really?  Nothing says your definition of “reform” is slightly suspect like a 65% increase in profits while increasing premiums in double digit amounts and denying coverage for reasons that defy human understanding.

And that is truly the crux of it. Despite months of cynical political maneuvering in Washington, there really is nothing to debate about health care. Health care is not a commodity, it is a human right.  What is being debated now is whether we will allow our health to continue to be commodified to satisfy corporate greed.  And the answer to that absolutely must be NO.

The commodification of health care implies a hugely disproportionate burden on women for many reasons.  We are charged more, we are denied maternity coverage and frequently are less able to afford it because we are less likely to work full time for large corporations. If we are assaulted, let alone seek treatment for possible AIDS exposure, we have suddenly developed the pre-existing condition of having been victimized. Health care companies may be profiting from this system, but the cost to society is enormous and clearly not only unaffordable but also extremely detrimental to our health.

The conversation we need to be having right now is not about how to ‘reform’ health care but about reclaiming our health as a human right. Profiteering from the denial of those rights is, if you will, a pre-existing condition of a system that no longer works. What is needed is a change of paradigm that recognizes the intrinsic value of caring and the intrinsic right to be taken care of when you are ailing without fear of going bankrupt in the process or simply being denied care altogether.

When a person is sick or injured, they should be taken care of without having to jump through bureaucratic and economic hoops so that companies like Humana can make a 65% profit. When a woman decides to have a child, it should be the standard of society that she receive the best prenatal care possible so that she and her baby are healthy. When she goes to a hospital to deliver the baby, there should never be a question of whether she has enough money to do so. If a rape or domestic assault victim seeks medical care, she should never be penalized for doing so.  And if she or her children are sick, she should be able to stay home from work without fear of losing her job. And women should NEVER be charged more than men for access to health care as many are now. The benefits of such a re-statement of health and care as a right would be significant.

Over the last several weeks, rallies for healthcare have been held across the nation, and numerous people have been arrested for civil disobedience. And no wonder, after months of dithering by politicians who have taken so much money from pharmaceutical and insurance companies that they have effectively been paid to not act on our behalf, it is time to regain the commons.  One of the protesters’ chants last week at Humana was, “Health care is is human right.”  And it is.

You can read what other women bloggers have to say on health care as part of the Women’s Day of Action on Health Care Reform here.

  • Share/Bookmark