The other day I submitted a written piece to a progressive media outlet. They didn’t publish it. In fact they didn’t publish any work by women on that particular day. They have published some of my work in the past, so presumably my writing is, in general, up to their standards and they did publish other pieces on the same topic that day, they just happened to be written by men.

On average, about 20% of the authors that get published on that site are female. That is not an okay number. I’ve brought it up with them before and have never gotten a sufficient answer. To me as a writer it is demoralizing because I don’t know if they rejected the piece because they didn’t like it or because they prefer to publish men–they’d never cop to that, but the evidence does indicate a bias that they don’t seem interested in addressing.

But this isn’t about me and it isn’t just about them. The problem is pervasive in progressive media, some are taking steps to address it, some aren’t, but the problem persists and sorry, it isn’t really progressive if it is sexist. So here is the challenge:

During the celebration of Women’s History Month in March, give women the column inches. Deliberately turn the tables and turn over the majority of your space to women. Try it for a day on March 1. If the world as we know it doesn’t come to an end and there isn’t a mass emasculation of men, try it for another day–still there? Keep it up for the month and then resolve to once and for all do what it takes to reach gender parity because your current policies that leave out women’s voices are demoralizing and damaging and misogynist and it is way past time to get beyond that paradigm.

In the meantime, suspecting that there is a snowball’s chance in hell that this challenge will be heeded, I will continue to produce and support women-informed media because without it, our voices are inadequately heard.

———-

Just as I finished writing the above came news that the Media Equity Collaborative has received a major gift that will be a significant boost for feminist media:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Anonymous Donor Steps Forward To Advance Feminist Media and Deepen Its Public Reach

Valentine’s Day, February 14 –

Media Equity Collaborative has a secret admirer. An anonymous donor has contributed $20,000 toward the research, development and outreach of this new initiative. Media Equity Collaborative emerged in 2007 to broaden the support for the over 350 feminist gender justice media organizations, outlets and projects that provide the primary public platform for feminist voices, gendered thinking and advancement of womanist ideas.

Excited by this affirmation of their work directors of Media Equity have mapped out an ambitious plan of action over the course of the next six months as they continue to seek additional support. Completion of a Theory of Change on gender justice media will strengthen the perception and depth of the necessity of gendered centered media. Stepped up outreach via groups like the National Council of Women’s Organizations will serve to heighten awareness about the critical role of using women’s media outlets in spreading the messages of hundreds of feminist service organizations. Media Equity will craft a pilot to serve as a bridge with a core of feminist media outlets and a specified group in the larger women’s movement to deepen the dynamics of a national public relations campaign.

Further, Media Equity will commit a portion of the funds to regrant efforts in the field. The fledgling initiative hopes to double this proportion of support to the field by creating a match through some on-line funding vehicle.

To both strengthen the reach and transfer knowledge and leadership to younger women, Shireen Mitchell, founder and executive director of Digital Sisters, based in Washington DC, and a long time Girl Geek, will take on a larger role. She joins Ariel Dougherty, initiator of Media Equity, to enhance the ability of this practitioner lead fund to play a critical evolutionary role in reaffirming feminist gendered creative space that is essential to fundamental transformation in the lives of all people, not solely women.

Media Equity Collaborative is a sponsored project of International Media Project, where Executive Director Lisa Rudman of National Radio Project (producer of Making Contact) also serves to guide this initiative. In 2008 Media Equity was awarded a $30,000 grant from Social Science Research Council (regrant funds of Ford Foundation) to do a survey of the field, examine sustainable funding models and hold a meeting of the field. Inspired Legacies under leadership of Tracy Gary and Media Equity have partnered to encourage donors to support the building of the gendered media public sphere.

Congrats to Ariel, Shireen, Lisa and all–this is huge and must needed!

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Congrats to Time Magazine for winning the  party like it’s still the sexist 50′s prize for the misogynist assumption implicit in this headline that equates the male gender to both genders.  Or maybe women don’t become immortal or become immortal in a different year she said banging her head.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Kudos to KPFA’s Women’s Magazine for pointing out that,

On Project Censored’s Top 25 list for 2010, not one story has to do with women and gender issues. But that doesn’t mean there was so much coverage of women’s issues; rather, the stories related to women are so censored that even the watchdogs didn’t notice them.

The program then goes on to devote space to important stories about women in 2010, well worth the listen:

Womens Magazine – January 3, 2011 at 1:00pm

Click to listen (or download)

But as Howard University Professor Carolyn M. Byerly points out, what this really illustrates is why, “structural analysis as to who owns and controls these media, and who makes communication policy,” is so badly needed.

Byerly’s research, to be published in the forthcoming Howard Journal of Communication, February 2011, has found that only 6% of radio and television stations are owned by women, in television the number is less than 5%.   Only .01% are owned by non-white women. Only 1% of top management in radio are women and a similarly small number of women serve on boards of directors.  With numbers like that, we shouldn’t be surprised when Byerly reports that, “women’s concerns are either missing or under-reported”.

The point Byerly makes is an important one–while we need to continue to call out the exclusion of women from the media, it is important to realize that this will continue unless we address the issue of women’s exclusion from ownership and positions of power in media production.

I’d also add that while we work on that, we need to be supportive of women-generated media that does exist. The Women’s Institute for Freedom of the Press has an excellent compendium of women’s media.  This is an excellent resource for finding out about the wonderful media work being done by women.  Women Action and The Media also has an excellent wiki page with more information about the exclusion of women in the media.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

I have no idea if Julian Assange is a rapist.  What I do know is that being a left-wing hero doesn’t make you innocent of those charges.  That point seems to be lost on a number of people who should know better.  I’m looking at you Bianca Jagger.  And you Naomi Wolf.  Keith Olbermann and Michael Moore, you too.  And now Daniel Ellsberg, who tweeted this yesterday,

Hello?  Mr. Ellsberg? Did you also listen to his accusers?  Do you think that every man who says he is innocent of rape charges that have been brought against him is innocent?  These remarks sadden me.  You are my hero but the values that you hold dear must not be at the expense of women’s human rights and safety.  You have said on Twitter that you will address the concerns of those who are calling you out for this remark.  Frankly the only response that will work is to apologize and say that your comment was ill-conceived;  when the left sounds like Justice Scalia when it comes to women’s human rights, that is unacceptable.

———-

Addenda:

1.  Interesting interview with one of Assange’s accusers here.

2.  A reminder from Haiti that rapists often get a free pass, often on a grand and very tragic scale.

3.  The Nation’s Greg Mitchell wants to know why I called him out on Twitter for retweeting Ellsberg’s tweet about the rape charges.  Because Ellsberg’s words carry a great deal of weight and shouldn’t just be given a no comment pass.  Mitchell comments on all sorts of things regularly, this would have been a good time to comment.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Okay, okay, I know–holiday season over, moving on.  But remember that ad that ran on television before Christmas with two shoppers and one holds up something and says that it is just like the one the other person asked for and the second person sadly says that it isn’t?  That is an apt analogy for Michael Moore’s self-serving apology to Sady Doyle a few days before Christmas for not responding to her sooner regarding the #MooreandMe campaign that she began to call out his grossly inappropriate remarks to Keith Olbermann regarding the Assange rape charges (see here for a lot more about that).

A week after Countdown host Keith Olbermann and guest Michael Moore sparked a Twitter protest over their dismissive treatment of rape allegations against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, Moore made an appearance on The Rachel Maddow Show in which he failed to address the protest directly, but made their imprint obvious in his transformed rhetoric on rape accusations. In a crowning irony, the man whose zeal for transparency-God Julian Assange started this protest finally made direct acknowledgement of it…in a private Twitter message to #MooreAndMe creator Sady Doyle.

Keeping with the seasonal theme, let’s unpackage that.  Nice that he apologized for not getting back to her sooner.  And at least he didn’t stoop as low as Olbermann who attacked his detractors while pompously declaring he was a major feminist ally.

But Moore is seriously naughty for not apologizing for what he said that she rightly called out in the first place and the  major arrogance of the notion that he needed airtime to re-state his remarks without ever acknowledging those that called him out in the first place or apologizing to them while on the air or heaven forbid, giving the microphone to Doyle instead.  But since he didn’t, here is the take-away that Doyle offers on her blog,

We fought for basic human decency for over a week. We fought, tirelessly, at great risk and expense, to make a mountain move. The mountain moved, like, three inches to the left. If you weren’t looking closely, you wouldn’t notice that it had moved at all. You definitely wouldn’t think to thank or acknowledge the incredibly hard work of the people who moved it. But we moved a mountain. We did the impossible. We went from just a random bunch of frustrated feminists, a random bunch of people on Twitter, to a force capable of changing the rape apologism in the narrative of one of the world’s biggest news stories.The mountain moved. The man came down from the tower. And we still live in a rape culture; we’re still not done fighting it; the narrative around Assange, in particular, is still hugely misogynist and hugely dangerous for those two women and will still encourage rape survivors not to report. We didn’t get a full apology and correction from Michael Moore; we didn’t get a full apology and correction from Keith Olbermann; neither of them have donated to the many rape crisis and anti-rape organizations to which we’ve provided links; heck, we didn’t even get credit on air. But we know what we’re capable of now. And that is immensely important.

Another point that bears emphasis–the women bringing the rape charges are not the only ones being disparaged–feminists are also being hauled out to the woodshed.  When calling his accusers honeypots didn’t get him enough traction, Julian Assange offered this analysis:

Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism,” he said. “I fell into a hornets’ nest of revolutionary feminism.

I’m not even sure I understand what that means, but the blame it on the feminists mantra comes through loud and clear.  And here is another one of that genre from the World Socialist Website,

Feminist opinion—as the Assange case and the Polanski affair before it have demonstrated—has become one of the means of legitimizing the suppression of nonconformists and political dissidents, and of changing the subject from the great social issues, above all, class oppression and social inequality, to stale and self-pitying concerns.

Translation:  Feminists don’t understand the big picture and therefore are damaging and shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Rape and sexual assault are “stale and self-pitying concerns”?  In a word, well actually two, up yours.

In her Winter Solstice message, visionary pagan Starhawk wrote,

…take a good look at what you want to shed. What are the behaviors, the beliefs, the patterns that no longer serve? Let them go. Make the commitment to change.

…envision the future you want to create. What world do we want to see? How will we step up to face the huge challenges of healing our communities, our economies, our climate and our environment? What risks will we need to take? What will we need to let go of, and what will we need to embrace?

Well I for one am well and ready to let go of the patriarchal left.  Yes we should be on the same side, but we aren’t  when men like Moore and Olbermann use their positions of privilege to trivialize and dismiss violence against women as well as those of us who stand up to tell them that they are wrong and damaging. When that happens, then I am done listening.

And yes I know, this is only the latest in a long, long history of left-wing misogyny.  But for me it is a break point.  I am tired.  Bone and soul weary tired of having to address this kind of damaging spew. So in answer to Starhawk’s challenge, that is what I need to let go of. I’m not going to listen to assurances that we are really on the same side or that you care about what I care about when the evidence says otherwise.  It is a toxic waste of time and energy.

As for what I’m embracing, it is that awesome wonderful capability that Doyle writes about.  That is what sustains me and lets me believe that we absolutely can and will move beyond the absurd notion that  leftwing misogyny is acceptable collateral damage for the greater good.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare