Jun 222009
 

The below article is a tad confusing, the first paragraph says stoning and amputation of a hand will be stricken from the Islamic penal code but then following paragraphs say it still has to be voted on and that it would be for a trial period, but this is a welcome development if it comes to pass.

One thing I had not known is that if a person who has been sentenced to stoning can free themselves, they are spared, however note below that a man is only buried up to his waist and a woman to her shoulders–seems quite an uneven burden to say the least on top of a practice that is beyond barbaric in the first place.

Obviously the timing of the story is a bit strange in the middle of all the unrest in Iran and iit remains to see how this will play out, but given the role women have clearly had in the current situation, the timing may be deliberate.

Iran’s parliament plans to scrap stoning and amputation of a hand as punishments in a revised version of the Islamic penal code, the official IRNA news agency reported Monday.

“Parliaments judicial commission decided not to put some Islamic punishments including stoning in the (revised) law in line with the interests of the country,” commission head Ali Shahrokhi told the agency.

He said the commission is also proposing the abolition of amputation and has considered the idea of a “special court for minors under 18.”

Once the commission has finalised the new version of the penal code, parliament will vote on whether to implement the revised law for a trial period.

Afterwards it will be discussed for final approval by the vetting legislative body, the Guardians Council.

Under Iran’s existing law, adultery is still punishable by stoning, which involves the hurling of stones in public at a partially buried convict. A man is buried up to his waist and a woman up to her shoulders.

Convicts are spared if they can free themselves.

A man found guilty of adultery was stoned to death in the northern city of Rasht earlier this year, a top official told reporters in May, despite a moratorium announced by the judiciary on such executions.

He said the woman involved in the case “repented and so has not been stoned.”

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

As we watch events in Iran unfold today, consider this essay by Lila Ghobady about the realities of what the events in Iran mean to women and why she did not vote in the election:

Why didn’t I vote in the latest elections for the president of the country of my birth, Iran? Because no matter who is the president of Iran, they would stone me!
As a woman whose husband refused to divorce her when she escaped the country and came to Canada as a refugee, I am considered this man’s wife as long as I am alive.

I would be lashed in public, raped in jail and stoned to death for selling my body in order to bring food to my family, as so many unfortunate Iranian women have been forced to do, as a single mother with no social assistance in a rich but deeply corrupted country like Iran.

No matter who is the president of Iran, I would disappear and be found dead (if I was lucky) if I were to keep writing and demanding my basic rights as a woman and intellectual who has no say in politics.

No matter who is the president of Iran, I would not be able to be a judge or even a witness in court, as a woman.

No matter who is the president of Iran, I would be lashed in public if I did not cover my head and body in public in compliance with the mandatory Islamic dress code.

———-

In the spirit of the above cartoon, we will continue to blog the events in Iran.  As I have noted previously, there are several excellent sites for up-to-the-minute news out of Iran, they include:

The Guardian (UK) live blog

Nico Pitney’s live  blog on the Huffington Post

Zahra Rahnavard’s Facebook Page (she is the wife of Hossein Mousavi)

#iranelection on Twitter

And via Nico Pitney’s blog comes this phenomenal  music video by Weapon-X with inspiring and amazing lyrics and photos:

And lastly, a reminder that protests on other issues are taking place elsewhere:

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
Jun 192009
 

As the people of Iran have taken to the streets to reclaim their country from tyranny, the story of Iran has also been about the right of people everywhere to free and uncensored news. Using all manner of social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Iranians and their supporters have been getting the story out of Iran even when the Iranian government cut off traditional means of communication.

The extraordinary nature of this story is that within days, the U.S. government was begging Twitter to postpone previously scheduled maintenance and stay in operation and top mainstream media stories were beginning with, ‘we got nothing but here’s what we found on Twitter.’ As Patti Smith put it in the lyrics to People Have The Power, “People have the power to redeem the work of fools.” And it would appear this week that is exactly what just happened.

Throughout the week, Feminist Peace Network has been posting both the wise voices of women speaking out about the crisis as well as looking at the impact the current situation has on the lives of Iranian women. In a commentary on the Huffington Post, Iranian Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi points out that this crisis is about far more than just the election (also noted by WFAFI earlier this week) and offers the following suggestions for what is necessary to resolve the current situation:

1. The unconditional release of every individual arrested and imprisoned for having objected to the results of the elections.

2. Ordering the cessation of Basij and police violence toward protestors.

3. Declaring the election void.

4. Ordering new elections under the auspices of international organizations.

5. Paying compensation to the injured and to the families of those who have been killed.

The FPN blog will continue to post on this topic as events unfold because as feminist technologist Deanna Zandt, who has been commenting on this story throughout the week noted yesterday on Twitter, “I’d rather try to address the problems that come with “mob rule” than continue with a milennia’s worth of patriarchal gatekeeping.” One truly has to wonder what the world would be like if the American people had taken to the streets and insisted on the truth in these kinds of numbers after the 2000 election.

As a final note, this morning my local newspaper had banished the Iran story to the inner bowels of the first section, as I suspect a number of other newspapers have done as well. Not a huge loss since their coverage was woefully lacking in the first place. Here are several excellent sources of up-to-date coverage of Iran (as well as a few awesome graphics), in addition, I highly recommend #iranelection on Twitter. Look at these, go back and look at your local newspaper and the evening news, draw your own conclusions.

Via The Cagle Post:

Nico Pitney live-blogging on the Huffington Post.

The Guardian (UK)‘s constantly updated Iran news.

Amnesty International on the Iranian Soccer Team’s green wristbands:

Coverage specifically discussing the role of and implications for women:

And finally, this footage from Iran goes well beyond what even cable ‘news’ will show:

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

From the Women’s Forum Against Fundamentalism In Iran (WFAFI):

Over the past several days, the world community has seen first hand what the Iranian people, especially women, are willing to do for a free and democratic Iran. The price of freedom has taken lives of many in recent days, including several women. Thousands have been arrested and taken to notorious torture chambers of the Iranian regime in various cities. Among those women have lost their lives, are:

  • Fatemeh Barati killed in University of Tehran
  • Mina Ehterami killed in University of Tehran
  • Zohreh Peeshdadian stabbed to death in the suburb of Karaj

According to the latest report from Iran, at least 58 people have been killed and more than 200 people have been kidnapped in the last 72 hours. The fact is the post-election rallies and protests speak of a much larger movement for real change that has now erupted and it is clearing any doubts about the undemocratic and fundamentalist nature of the regime in Iran. It is shameless to be silent and not speak in support of the Iranian people. It is shameless to place “national security interests” before speaking out in defense of basic human rights.

President Obama must take a much tougher stance in response to the Iranian movement. He should stand on the side of the Iranian people who shout “down with the dictatorship.” Washington’s focus must be on Iranian’s outcry and not the regime in power. The US President is correct to assume there is no difference between Ahmadinejad and Mousavi. In addition to their joint position on nuclear issue and terrorism as pillars of Iran’s foreign policy, both  Ahmadinejad and Mousavi were directly and indirectly engaged in:    – The 1980 engineering of “Cultural Revolution” in the universities and the subsequent crackdown on all opposition groups and student leaders from 1981- 1987 which led to mass arrests and executions, including execution of pregnant women, 9-year-old girl and 70-year-old grandmother.

  • The 1988 massacre of political prisoners which led to execution of thousands including many women.
  • The chain killings of the writers and intellectuals with at least 133 people killed, mostly in Tehran, during the 1990′s.
  • The worldwide assassination of exiled political opponents which took lives of at least 210 people from 1991 to 1997.
  • The crushing of student movement, mass arrests and executions in the summer of 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003.
  • The crackdown and mass arrest of women on International Women’s Day in 2004, 2005, and 2006.
  • The weekly public hanging including several hangings and stoning of women in 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Therefore, it is unacceptable to attribute what is happening in Iran to just an outcry over the recent election results. There are much more radical dynamics on the ground than what is reported in the western media about Iran.  Based on the reports Women’s Forum has received from Iran,  the banners reading “where is my vote”, is not in support of Mousavi, rather it is a direct challenge to electoral process and the ‘republic’ claim of this regime. The silent march and ongoing protests are not “pro- Mousavi rallies”, rather people are using the political opportunity that has presented itself given the infighting among the theocratic factions of this regime.

Iranian people are demanding real change by rejecting this regime in its entirety. As the message of real change becomes louder, Mousavi will face a choice of either settling with the theocratic regime or pay the price just as the people in the streets face bullets and violence.

There is no doubt the Iranian regime will escalate the current conflict with more suppression and violence in coming days. The world community has a choice to stand in silence or speak in support of the Iranian people and their desire for an internationally monitored election. This is a call that has also been renewed by the exiled leader of Iran’s main opposition group, Maryam Rajavi. Let us hope Washington is taking notes.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
Jun 172009
 

Via The National (Abu Dhabi):

The iconography dominating global television coverage of Iran’s biggest demonstrations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution is stunning: women are on the front line of the protests against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s allegedly fraudulent re-election. It is no surprise. They feel most robbed by his “stolen” victory.

“We feel cheated, frustrated and betrayed,” said an Iranian woman in a message circulated on Facebook. Iran’s energetic female activists are using the social networking site to mobilise opposition to Mr Ahmadinejad. Iranian women also have a dynamic presence on the country’s blogosphere – the biggest in the Middle East – which they are using to keep up popular momentum against the election outcome.

Many Iranian women will suspect that a prime reason the election was “stolen” was to keep them in their place.

Continue reading here.

See also this video via Al Jazeera English regarding women being barred from running for President in Iran.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare