Via IRIN:

The UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) in Gaza, local Palestinian NGOs and mental health professionals are reporting increased incidents of domestic violence and sexual assault against women in Gaza since the beginning of 2009.

An unpublished UNIFEM survey of male and female heads of 1,100 Gaza households conducted between 28 February and 3 March indicates there was an increase in violence against women during and after the 23-day war which ended on 18 January.

“According to our staff, and through clinical observation, there was increased violence against women and children during and after the war,” said public relations coordinator for the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, Husam al-Nounou.

“We can attribute this to the fact that most people were exposed to traumatic incidents during the war, and one way people react to stress is to become violent.”

GCMHP, which runs six clinics and treats an estimated 2,000 mental health patients a year, carried out a post-war assessment, interviewing about 3,500 Gaza residents, said al-Nounou.

“This war was extremely harsh, people felt insecure, vulnerable and unable to protect themselves, their children and their families; when people were trapped at home this increased the stress and anxiety,” said al-Nounou.

“Before the war the centre was facilitating supervised visits for 30 families, but now it is doing this for 60 families,” said Bakr Turkmani, an attorney at the PCDCR.

“The number of divorce and separation cases has increased significantly since the war, and domestic violence played a role in the increase,” he said.

Director of the women’s unit at the leading Palestinian human rights organisation, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), Muna As-Shawa, said the centre had received reports of increased domestic violence and sexual assault during and after the hostilities. The unit had counselled over 600 women.

“During and after the war women struggled to fulfil their roles as mothers, and care for their children without electricity and water, while under attack,” said As-Shawa, “and if the husband died, sometimes the father-in-law took the inheritance and tried to take custody of the children.”

PCHR is providing legal advice to widows.

The Women’s Affairs Centre (WAC) in Gaza said it had organised meetings with 200 women across Gaza after the war.

“Many women who never experienced violence at home, were beaten during the war,” WAC director Amal Siam told IRIN.

Scores of women who lost their husbands came to WAC seeking assistance after their fathers-in-law tried to take custody of their children, said Siam, adding that there had been an increased number of divorce cases during the hostilities.

According to UNIFEM, the results of the first UN inter-agency gender needs assessment are due in May.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

From the Britain Palestine Twinning Network:

Twinning groups welcome Palestinian women on speaking tour of Britain for International Women’s Day

Eleven Palestinian women from all ages and all walks of life will be in Camden on 4th March at the beginning of a speaking tour that will take them all over Britain, from Bristol to Cambridge and Brighton to Newcastle. Two other women will be in Scotland for similar events.

Five students together with workers in education, health and social services, members of women’s groups and members of local twinning committees are being brought to London by different twinning groups that are members of the Britain-Palestine Twinning Network. They will be joining in International Women’s Day celebrations and public meetings on Palestine, as well as visiting universities, schools and workplaces to promote Britain-Palestine Twinning.

“Public attention has turned towards Palestine since the Israeli attacks on Gaza in January,” said Nandita Dowson, secretary of the Twinning Network, “This is very important because the human rights violations in Palestine are the centre of a knot of trouble that not only affects the Middle East but involves all of us.

“But January 2009 in Gaza is just one part of the story. These women will be telling of the difficulties caused to normal life by the Separation Wall and the brutalities of the Israeli Occupation in the West Bank, which is all part of the Israeli pressure on people in Palestine to leave, because they want the land but not the people in it. “This tour will take these women’s stories to an audience of thousands across the
country.”

Women coming include:

• Hiba Ayyad, a student whose mother was killed by Israeli soldiers in her own house last September (from Abu Dis, with links to Camden)

• Sirien Sawafteh, who has been involved in building a school for children in the Jordan Valley in a place where Israel says it is illegal for Palestinians to build (from Toubas, with links to Brighton),

• Najat Abdurahme whose village Bil’in is convulsed with problems as the Israelis build the Separation Wall and shoot at peaceful demonstrators every Friday (from Bil’in, with links to Liverpool)

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Dear Friends,

A three-person delegation from the peace group CODEPINK just returned from Gaza, entering through the Egyptian border at Rafah. We were able, in a short period of time, to see the terrible devastation and meet with human rights, medical, and women’s organizations.

We found the people of Gaza very anxious to have foreign delegations come to learn about their plight and push for an end to the blockade. That is why we are organizing a delegation to return to Gaza in time for International Women’s Day, March 8. The March delegation will be hosted by the Women’s Division of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).

There is always the possibility that the Egyptian government won’t let us cross the border. In that case, we plan to set up an encampment near the border to call attention to the need to open the borders and end the siege of Gaza.

Continue reading »

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 
Women Leading Protest from Within
Stop the Massacre in Gaza

Received from the Coalition of Women for Peace:

Israel’s brutal attack on Gaza started on Saturday, December 27th 2008, after three years of strangling siege. Within a few hours, the Coalition of Women for Peace organized various peace groups and more than 1,500 women and men in a protest to stop the war immediately. The demonstrators marched to the Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv, where the Prime Minister Ehud Olmert held his press conference to justify the bombardment and mass-killings by the Israeli Air Forces.

In the following days, which turned into weeks, thousands of others joined the protest. True, this struggle did not stop the attack and its dreadful war crimes. However, we have tried, with all of our efforts, to bring the voice of resistance to the Israeli public and the international community. This brief report aims to shed some light on the process of organizing the struggle against the war in Israel. These are just a few examples of a desperate cry of thousands of Israeli citizens to stop the massacre in Gaza.

What We Did:

1. Set the Coalition against the War in Motion. CWP has re-organized the wide coalition of organizations against the siege, which has been functioning with medium to low energy in the last few months. This action brought together more than 30  organizations, big and small, from the peace movement and the Left in Israel (including Hadash, Balad and Ra’am-Ta’al parties). The Coalition against the War gathered on the third day of the war to finalize messages and activities, in order to organize the first mass demonstration. By the end of the first week of the war, more than 10,000 people took to the streets to protest the killing in Gaza. On the last Saturday of the attack, we again organized a mass rally, this time in Jaffa, with again more than 10,000 demonstrators.

2. Cross-Movement Coordination. A smaller team was built out of CWP in order to coordinate the ongoing daily protests around the country. This team helped dozens of groups to reach the media, gain exposure and receive legal aid as needed (unfortunately often, as we helped more than 100 activists harassed by the police and arrested in peaceful protests). The team also provided other help in logistics and coordination and regularly published a digest of the events on the left bulletins and mailing lists. The formation of the team allowed more people to take part in the actions against the war ˆ first and foremost because they could feel a part of a committed movement which shares resources, knowledge and experience. For many peace activists, it was the sense of community and solidarity across various organizations that motivated them to continue protesting despite exhaustion, despair, exposure to violence, threats and political persecution.

3. Media Work. The Media Team informed the press about events and protests on a daily basis. Before mass-demonstrations, we also initiated meetings and consultations about media strategy. The “patriotic” media either dismissed voices against the war in Gaza, or presented them as dangerous and treacherous. With persistence and commitment, the team succeeded in bringing the voice of protest into the Israeli and international media, as well as promoting several stories about the systematic repression of the protest by the police, the secret service (Shabak) and the outrageous governmental policies.

4. International Advocacy. Understanding that challenging the Israeli consensus is not enough, international advocacy became a major priority. A group of CWP activists organized as an “International Team” and worked on coordinating our actions with peace and women’s groups and movements around the world. The group focused on providing information, political analysis, statements and calls to action to these groups, as well as writing appeals and letters to political leadership of the European Union and the U.S.A.

5. Legal Action. Following the instructions of Israel’s Attorney General, the police attempted to limit the protest by imposing impossible restrictions on the mass-demonstration in Tel Aviv. For instance, they demanded that the organizers will personally guarantee that none of the 10,000 protestors will wave a Palestinian flag. Eilat Maoz, CWP General Coordinator, and Haggai Mater, an activist, petitioned the Supreme Court and succeeded in canceling this impossible limitation.

Guiding Principles:

1. The Expanding Circle. Our main strategic decision was to organize the protest based on the concept of “expanding circles.” This concept stresses the need to mobilize more and more audiences against Israeli aggression by building a pluralistic front, in which various voices and political programs can find their place.
This is also why one of our first decisions was to “agree not to agree” on the political solution, but rather to allow each group to express its messages in the coordinated actions. In university campuses, for example, large groups of Arab and Jewish students never active before began joining the protests. Women without previous experience in political work joined the Coalition of Women for Peace and became active in our ad-hoc action teams.

2. Arab-Jewish Partnership and Local Struggles. CWP had a very clear stand inside the Coalition against the War regarding the importance of maintaining ongoing coordination between the peace organizations, the Left parties and the Palestinian civil society in Israel. We insisted on the importance, especially in times of severe racist propaganda, of standing together and calling: “Arabs and Jews refuse to be enemies.” Another important feature stressed by CWP was the strengthening local protests across Israel. CWP activities expanded from Tel Aviv-Jaffa and Jerusalem to Haifa, Be’er Sheva, Sachnin and other areas. (Slogan in manifestation: Women against War; Stop the War; the Occupation is Killing Us All)

3. Feminist Agenda and Women’s Action for Peace. CWP was the leading force in the Coalition against the War. At the same time, we worked on building another coalition ˆ a coalition of feminist organizations against the war. We organized several women’s protests ˆ in Haifa and Tel Aviv, gathering hundreds of Arab and Jewish women. Perhaps most critical were the activities lead by a group of CWP activists in the south of Israel. This group organized several feminist protests in Be’er Sheva and in Sderot (both in the rockets’ zones) and a successful conference in Sapir college in Sderot. Coming from the towns and cities that the Israeli government presented as completely pro-war, their voices were very strong and important ones in the overall protest movement. The statement signed by women’s organizations in Israel was translated into various languages and endorsed by organizations world-wide. Women’s Peace Coalition in Serbia, the Organization for Women’s Liberation ˆ Iran, Women in Black world-wide, and women’s organizations from Sudan, Canada, Australia, U.S.A and European countries sent us words of solidarity, organized actions and pressured their governments to break the international silent support for this war.

Thank you!

Socio-Political Context: Political Persecution, Biased Media and Right-Wing Incitement:

1.  What did it mean to be active against the war during the 21 days of Israel’s military attack on Gaza? While the majority of peace activists and anti-war demonstrators faced various forms of silencing, persecution and social exclusion, Palestinian citizens of Israel were the main target for repression and silencing.

2.  Legal persecution: More than 550 people were arrested in peaceful protests against the war, and over 200 have yet to be released. The vast majority of the arrestees are Palestinian citizens of Israel. Israel’s Attorney General instructed the State Prosecutors to request arrest until the end of legal proceedings for each person arrested during the protests.

3.  Right-wing anti-democratic incitement: Leading politicians in Israel voiced inciting expressions against people opposing or skeptical about the war, including threats of citizenship deprivation and labeling them as traitors and alleys of Hamas. The former Prime Minister and a leading candidate in the upcoming
elections, Binyamin Netanyahu, declared in the Knesset: “We require every citizen to be loyal and we will act harshly against the collaborators of Hamas from within.”

4.  Fascist violence: Demonstrations and rallies were regularly assaulted by rightwing people and crowds. Life threats on key activists were not uncommon. In the mass demonstration in Tel Aviv, for example, several activists were assaulted and injured by counter-demonstrators.

5.  Police violence and persecution: We often had to deal with police aggression and persecution. Many key activists were taken by the police and/or the security services (Shabak) to interrogations, where they were threatened and pressure to maintain a low profile.

6.  Biased media: The Israeli media remained, throughout the war, extremely biased and hardly open to inform the public of the horrors in Gaza. We did succeed to bring the voices opposing to the war into the media, yet it was difficult to challenge the public consensus and justifications for the attack.

The CWP Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza continues with all its strength. Now the international key players are entering the Gaza strip. It is critical to ensure that their presence will make a real difference. That it will protect people’s right to life, dignity and freedom, rather than normalize the current state of siege and occupation de-facto.

See the CWP website for updates and further information.

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare
 

Received via Women In Black:

It is time that the United States negotiate in good faith with Hamas, the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. It is also time that the U.S. government tell Israel to release the Hamas Parliamentarians it illegally arrested. President Obama, please say something about Gaza. You have been roundly condemned for your continued silence in the face of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Israel in Gaza. Silence is complicity. Not one more bomb for Israel.

Israeli action in Gaza has outraged the world. Starting with Israel’s inhumane blockade of Gaza when it didn’t like the 2006 election results that put Hamas officially into power. In September 2007, Israel declared Gaza an “enemy entity.” Of course, Israeli efforts to isolate the Gaza Strip can be traced back to Ariel Sharon as early as 2005. In carrying out its military Operation Cast Lead, Israel not only committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, it also carried out a long-standing goal of Gaza isolation. The President’s continued silence on Gaza and the Palestinian right of self-determination is unacceptable.

I would like to commend President Obama for recognizing that peace is the imperative and that the United States can play a constructive role in its attainment. However, placing a phone call to an irrelevant “leader” in an attempt to revive his political standing is not a route to peace: it is a journey down the same road that we’re already on, that is massacres, genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, torture–all with U.S. weapons, paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

The President must call the elected representatives of the Palestinian people and that means dealing with Hamas.

President Obama has already spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. George Mitchell, the President’s Middle East Envoy, is reportedly scheduled to visit the region, but is expected to meet only with Egyptian, Israeli, Saudi, and Jordanian leaders, and the West Bank’s Abbas. Unfortunately, despite worldwide revulsion and United Nations outrage at Israeli actions in Gaza, Gaza has not been reported to be one of the Presidential Envoy’s destinations.

Even worse, one of the first officials that Obama called on his first day in office was Palestinian Mahmood Abbas. Abbas, however, is no longer President, heading a government that has no opportunity to govern, from a state that exists only as a construct not made by the Palestinian people. For the United States to embark upon the path of peace, it must recognize and act on the fact that Mahmood Abbas is now irrelevant.

I believe that the call to Abbas occurred because of pressure on President Obama from outraged activists around the country and around the world calling for him to do something. But Abbas is irrelevant if the goal is peace.

If the goal, however, is to appear to be doing something while all the time doing nothing but allowing the violence of U.S.-sponsored military action to spread including saber rattling against Syria and Iran, then the President is on the right path.

The American people voted for change and peace. President Obama’s current path will produce neither.

I have implored President Obama to say something about Gaza. He has been roundly condemned for his continued silence in the face of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Israel in Gaza. Silence in the face of such criminal behavior is complicity.

President Obama must urgently place a call to the elected government of the Palestinian people.

President Obama can send a strong message to the warmongers inside his own party and present them “a clean break” from war. I encourage him to do so. We will not be fooled by actions that have the appearance of putting us on a path for peace, but that are public relations projects that buy time for more war.

Continue reading »

DeliciousFacebookGoogle+RedditStumbleUponTwitterPrintFriendlyEmailEvernoteDiggShare